Trump threatens worse trade deal for China if Beijing stalls until after his re-election
US President Donald Trump has once again criticized China’s trade practices, warning negotiations could get tougher. The statements come as Beijing and Washington are headed into another round of trade negotiations in Shanghai.
In a series of tweets on Tuesday, Trump warned if China waits and he wins re-election, the trade deal will be much tougher for Beijing.
“China is doing very badly, worst year in 27 – was supposed to start buying our agricultural product now – no signs that they are doing so. That is the problem with China, they just don’t come through,” Trump wrote.
My team is negotiating with them now, but they always change the deal in the end to their benefit. They should probably wait out our Election to see if we get one of the Democrat stiffs like Sleepy Joe. Then they could make a GREAT deal, like in past 30 years, and continue to ripoff the USA, even bigger and better than ever before.”
US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer will meet on Tuesday and Wednesday in Shanghai with a delegation led by China’s Vice Premier Liu He.
According to Trump, “The problem with them waiting, however, is that if & when I win, the deal that they get will be much tougher than what we are negotiating now… or no deal at all. We have all the cards, our past leaders never got it!”
>>7260748 "Trump has periodically called for stricter voter ID laws, which advocates warn could restrict ballot access in low-income communities, students and people of color." Like Clockwork. ID required (when)? Sheep follow the most absurd arguments. D_party voter corruption on display. Q
Reminder re: impeachment. 2/3rd Senate vote required to impeach POTUS. 53-47 Logical thinking. You are watching D's 'con' liberal base using 'hope' tactics while maintaining 'POTUS obstruction of Justice' FAKE NEWS narrative. Think 2020. Q
[Smoke & Mirrors] How do you attempt to keep the 'narrative' in play [control the 'sheep']? https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dems-launch-impeachment-investigation-with-bid-for-grand-jury-info-insist-mueller-delivered📁 Key sentence: Nadler called the grand jury materials “critically important” for their investigation. Does Nadler understand that the 'critically important' material requested would be illegal for AG Barr to disclose? https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/04/mueller-report-attorney-general-grand-jury-information/📁 "This means Attorney General Barr must redact grand-jury material from the Mueller report before disclosing it to Congress. Democrats will complain long and loud about this, but I don’t see how Barr can be reasonably faulted for following the law. Congress, after all, has the power to legislate an amendment to Rule 6(e) that would permit disclosure of grand-jury materials from a special counsel investigation to appropriate congressional committees." Will members of the D party Congress attempt to amend Rule 6(e) in order to obtain grand jury material deemed 'critically important'? No? Logical thinking, why? Why paint a narrative that the one item you cannot possess is the one item you need in order to justify your argument? People elected 'knowingly' spreading false-information [disinformation]? Puppets follow orders. Think for yourself. Q
Possible China monitored [MUELLER] hearing? Possible China analyzing likelihood of POTUS re_ELEC 2020? Possible China taking steps [think propaganda] to harm POTUS re: 2020? Possible China in sec_comms w/ D candidate(s) running for President re: re-institute US piggy-bank? Possible China in sec_comms w/ former D_party senior officials re: re-institute US piggy-bank? Possible China put extreme [threatening?] pressure on NK the day of the [MUELLER] hearing (coincidence?) should hearing swing to POTUS? Possible acts were taken in effort to diminish (lessen) D_blow? Possible acts were taken in effort to 'change the narrative'? Define 'False Flag'. Q