>>7965951 SC to hear case re: legality of impeachment Articles drafted by House? [clean record] Failed to support [Constitution] 'Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors'? Partisan politics. Q
https://twitter.com/KarluskaP/status/1222922986262495232📁 Impeachment end. [Attempts to send new Article(s) to Senate to delay?] State of the Union. Boomerang. “And the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air, gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.” Q
You didn't think we highlighted 'Epstein' for no reason did you? Those who were once protected are no longer. Timing is EVERYTHING. Hunters become PREY. Q
>>7942766 I'll have fun when things start happening in OUR favor!!
>>7942819 Play a game of 'Where Are They Now?'. Think CEOs. Think FBI. Think DOJ. Think WH. Think State. Think C_A. Think [F] intel. ……….. Think Judge install. Think SC install. Think DOJ install. Think FBI install. Think C_A install. Think PM UK install. Think! THE BEST IS YET TO COME. Q
https://oig.justice.gov/press/2019/2019-12-09.pdf📁 Worth remembering. The day the public learned [4] FISAs? Dec 9, 2019. [Anons: August 31, 2018] The day the public learned illegal SURV (targeting) of Page (2)? January 23, 2020. [-Cruz] Important markers to remember. Watch the news. Q
When did the public first learn re: FISA warrants re: +3 [non Page]? If FISA warrants deemed to be illegal [ALL SURV LEAPFROG HOPS] what happens to MUELLER's case(s)? How do you invalidate a claim? Conspiracy to commit…. Rubber bullets sting but do not last. Q
DECLAS CoC POTUS > Barr Barr > Durham [[F] classified intel provided [FVEY - Non FVEY] as needed] Does Durham want to hold [freeze] 'public' declas due to criminal nature of the probe(s)? Think GJ material. When did the investigation begin? When did the investigation really begin? Nothing can stop what is coming. Nothing. Slow drip > Flood Q
They are not attempting to remove POTUS from office. [2/3rd Senate will not vote to convict [no law(s) broken]] They are attempting to protect themselves from prosecution and prevent the public from discovering the truth. Q
If Russia didn't [hack] the DNC (insider breach)….. & US INTEL supported Russia [breach] claim…… What does that tell you? THE US GOV [UNDER POTUS] WENT THROUGH [STILL ONGOING] A MAJOR REMOVE/REPLACE OPERATION. TRAITORS EVERYWHERE. 'DRAIN THE SWAMP' HAS 'REAL' MEANING. [Mueller][impeachment] all meant to 'slowdelayprevent' the exposure [& prosecution] of their crimes. Will new articles of impeachment be 'continually' drafted in effort to hold as ammunition to prevent Senate hearings re: [D] party corruption? Moves & countermoves. The 'silent' war continues. Q
>>7653597 The point being many (R)s are confused re: must go through additional 'hoops' in order to vote (re: (R) party registration). % not mailed? % 'supposedly' lost? % delayed? % returned [D] _unchanged? Q
>>7643842 orensicator’s first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second.
These statistics are matters of record and essential to disproving the hack theory. No Internet service provider, such as a hacker would have had to use in mid-2016, was capable of downloading data at this speed. Compounding this contradiction, Guccifer claimed to have run his hack from Romania, which, for numerous reasons technically called delivery overheads, would slow down the speed of a hack even further from maximum achievable speeds.